Contoh Soal TKA Bahasa Inggris Lanjut: Bukti Publik

Contoh soal TKA Bahasa Inggris lanjut edisi 12 Oktober 2026 berfokus pada bukti publik. TKA Bahasa Inggris Tingkat Lanjut melatih pembaca memahami teks eksposisi dan diskusi serta mengevaluasi kekuatan argumennya. Seluruh stimulus disusun untuk latihan mandiri siswa SMA/MA/SMK atau pendalaman materi bersama guru.

Tiga bacaan berbahasa Inggris mengajak siswa menilai indikator layanan publik, hasil uji coba kampus, dan data pengamatan warga. Tersedia tepat 30 soal berupa pilihan ganda, pilihan ganda kompleks, serta penilaian benar atau salah. Pilih satu jawaban pada pilihan ganda, semua jawaban yang sesuai pada soal kompleks, dan nilai setiap pernyataan pada soal kategori.

Contoh Soal TKA Bahasa Inggris Tingkat Lanjut

Reading for questions 1–10: What a Dashboard Leaves Out

A town council has introduced a public dashboard showing how quickly it responds to complaints about broken streetlights. Before the dashboard appeared, residents often struggled to discover whether their reports had reached the correct department. The new system provides a reference number and displays the proportion of cases marked as resolved within seven days. Supporters argue that making performance visible creates pressure to improve it. That argument is reasonable, but the meaning of “resolved” deserves attention. In the first month, the department counted a case as resolved when a contractor was assigned. In the second month, it changed the definition to mean that a working light had been checked on site. The reported success rate fell, even though residents may have received a more reliable service. A comparison that ignored the changed definition would therefore be misleading. There is also a question of who enters the data. Reports submitted online appear immediately, while telephone reports are added by staff at the end of each day. Residents who cannot use either channel may remain absent from the system. A colourful map of complaints could consequently show where reporting is easiest rather than where streetlights fail most often. This does not make the dashboard useless. It means that the dashboard should be treated as one source of evidence, supported by periodic inspections and accessible reporting routes. The council should publish definitions beside its figures and explain any changes. It should also distinguish the time taken to acknowledge a report from the time taken to restore a light. Residents would then be able to ask more precise questions. A shorter acknowledgement time might be welcome without being confused with a shorter repair time. Public measurement is most valuable when it helps people examine decisions rather than merely admire a score. A dashboard cannot represent every experience, but it can make its own limits visible. That modest form of transparency would provide a stronger basis for accountability than a perfect-looking percentage whose calculation remains unclear.

Soal 1. What does the dashboard concern?

A. Hospital appointments.

B. Streetlight complaints.

C. Library loans.

D. Water bills.

E. School attendance.

Soal 2. What counted as resolution in the first month?

A. A resident's payment.

B. Assignment of a contractor.

C. Publication of a map.

D. Installation of a new pole.

E. An on-site check.

Soal 3. When are telephone reports entered?

A. Every seven weeks.

B. At the end of each day.

C. Only after repairs.

D. At the end of the year.

E. Immediately by callers.

Soal 4. Why could a falling success rate coexist with better service?

A. Telephone reports were banned.

B. Residents ceased making complaints.

C. All repairs stopped.

D. The definition became more demanding.

E. Contractors changed the town's name.

Soal 5. Which distinction does the author recommend?

A. Acknowledgement time and repair time.

B. Daytime and evening colours.

C. Public and private opinions without data.

D. Maps and photographs only.

E. Old and new residents only.

Soal 6. The phrase “admire a score” criticises ...

A. residents who read slowly

B. contractors who repair lights

C. publishing definitions

D. accepting attractive metrics without examining their meaning

E. using numbers for any purpose

Soal 7. Select all limitations identified in the passage.

A. Reporting patterns may differ from failure patterns.

B. All online reports are necessarily false.

C. Every contractor has refused inspections.

D. Some residents may be missing from reporting channels.

E. Definitions changed between months.

Soal 8. Mark each statement True or False according to the text.

Statement	True	False
a. The author supports supplementing dashboard data with inspections.
b. Telephone reports appear immediately.
c. The author considers the dashboard entirely useless.

Soal 9. Select all findings that would strengthen the concern about reporting bias.

A. Online reporting is concentrated in areas with fewer actual faults.

B. Areas with poor internet access have many failed lights but few reports.

C. Every neighbourhood has identical reporting access and inspection results.

D. A dashboard changes its colour scheme.

E. An inspection discovers unreported faults among residents unable to use either channel.

Soal 10. Mark each evaluation True or False.

Statement	True	False
a. Comparing rates without consistent definitions can produce an invalid conclusion.
b. Publishing limitations can support accountability rather than necessarily weaken it.
c. A higher resolution percentage alone proves faster physical repairs.

Reading for questions 11–20: Should a Campus Trial Decide a Policy?

A college is considering whether to replace printed course packs with a digital platform. A small trial found that participating students spent less on printing and searched readings more quickly. The technology office recommends extending the platform to every course next term. It argues that delaying the change would preserve unnecessary costs. Several lecturers accept the potential advantages but question whether the trial supports such a rapid expansion. The trial involved two courses whose students volunteered to participate. Most already owned suitable devices and had dependable internet access. Courses requiring detailed drawings, side-by-side comparison of documents, or long reading sessions were not included. These differences do not refute the trial's findings, but they limit the conditions under which those findings can be applied. Supporters respond that a universal policy could be accompanied by device loans and downloadable files. They also point out that printed packs are not equally convenient for everyone: a student with low vision may benefit from adjustable text. Critics agree, while noting that a platform can still create barriers if its design works poorly with assistive software. Accessibility is a feature to test, not an automatic consequence of using a screen. The choice need not be reduced to immediate replacement or permanent rejection. The college could run a second trial across a wider range of courses, including students who would not normally volunteer. It could compare total costs, study experiences, and accessibility, while retaining a printed option where necessary. Such a trial would require staff time and therefore would not be cost-free. Nevertheless, its expense could be justified if it prevents a larger implementation from excluding students or creating unexpected workload. A sensible decision should consider both the cost of waiting and the cost of being wrong. The first trial provides evidence that the platform can work under certain conditions. It does not settle whether those conditions exist throughout the college. Expansion may ultimately be appropriate, but confidence should grow with the breadth of the evidence rather than with the enthusiasm of its strongest supporters.

Soal 11. What change is the college considering?

A. Cancelling all reading courses.

B. Removing device loans.

C. Ending internet access.

D. Replacing printed packs with a digital platform.

E. Closing the technology office.

Soal 12. Who participated in the first trial?

A. Only lecturers.

B. Volunteers in two courses.

C. Every college student.

D. Students in all drawing courses.

E. Applicants who had not enrolled.

Soal 13. Which benefit did the trial report?

A. Faster searching of readings.

B. Elimination of all study costs.

C. Guaranteed higher examination scores.

D. Free devices for everyone.

E. No need for teaching staff.

Soal 14. Why does the author discuss detailed drawings and long reading sessions?

A. To identify conditions not represented in the trial.

B. To dismiss all digital work.

C. To recommend shorter degrees.

D. To prove that reading is unnecessary.

E. To show that volunteers lacked devices.

Soal 15. What assumption is challenged by the discussion of assistive software?

A. Every device can store files.

B. Printed packs always cost more.

C. Students prefer every printed page.

D. Lecturers oppose all technology.

E. Digital materials are automatically accessible.

Soal 16. What is the author's overall position?

A. Volunteers should determine policy alone.

B. Immediate universal replacement is proven necessary.

C. Digital platforms should never be used.

D. Only costs should be measured.

E. Broader testing should inform the scale of expansion.

Soal 17. Select all proposed elements of a second trial.

A. Total costs and accessibility.

B. A guarantee that every result will be positive.

C. Students who would not normally volunteer.

D. Study experiences.

E. A wider range of courses.

Soal 18. Mark each statement True or False.

Statement	True	False
a. The author acknowledges costs associated with further testing.
b. The first trial included all course types.
c. Device loans are suggested by supporters.

Soal 19. Select all additional findings that would most directly support wider implementation.

A. Total costs remain acceptable across a broader course sample.

B. The platform's logo is popular.

C. Assistive-software testing reveals no unresolved major barriers in the sampled courses.

D. Nonvolunteers with varied access conditions can use the platform effectively with support.

E. The original volunteers repeat their original preferences without additional testing.

Soal 20. Mark each evaluation True or False.

Statement	True	False
a. Questioning generalisation is different from denying the original findings.
b. The author weighs implementation risk against the cost of delay.
c. The passage proves that printed materials must remain compulsory in every course forever.

Reading for questions 21–30: Evidence from Citizen Observers

A regional conservation group wants to map the arrival of migrating birds using reports from residents. Professional teams cannot visit every location each day, so volunteer observations could provide information across a much wider area. The project invites people to record the species, location, date, and, when possible, a photograph. Its organisers hope that repeated records will reveal changes in seasonal arrival patterns. The strength of the project is also a source of difficulty. Observers vary in experience, and some places attract more volunteers than others. A rise in reports may indicate more birds, but it may also reflect better publicity or a new walking path. If organisers treat every increase as an ecological change, the resulting map may confuse changes in observation with changes in nature. One response would be to accept only reports submitted by trained specialists. This might improve consistency, yet it would sacrifice much of the geographical reach that makes public participation valuable. A more balanced approach would offer identification guidance, allow uncertain observations to be labelled, and arrange expert review for unusual records. The project could also record observation effort, such as how long a person watched and which locations were visited without a sighting. Recording no sighting may seem uninteresting, but it helps distinguish an unvisited place from a visited place where a bird was not observed. Even then, absence from a report is not absolute proof of absence from a habitat. Weather, visibility, and the bird's behaviour can affect detection. Conclusions should therefore reflect uncertainty rather than conceal it. Citizen observations need not compete with professional surveys. When the two are compared carefully, they can answer different parts of the same question. Volunteers contribute reach and repeated local attention; structured surveys provide more consistent sampling. The most credible project would explain how each source contributes and where each remains limited. Public involvement can then produce more than a larger dataset: it can help participants understand why scientific claims depend on methods as well as numbers.

Soal 21. What is the project trying to map?

A. Migration arrival patterns.

B. The prices of cameras.

C. The number of walking shoes.

D. Professional salaries.

E. Daily school attendance.

Soal 22. Which item is requested when possible?

A. A paid ticket.

B. A printed textbook.

C. A medical certificate.

D. A weather station.

E. A photograph.

Soal 23. What does the passage suggest recording besides sightings?

A. Observers' favourite colours.

B. Shop opening hours.

C. All personal messages.

D. Observation effort.

E. Household income.

Soal 24. Why might reports increase without more birds arriving?

A. Birds always avoid professionals.

B. Maps create new habitats.

C. Migration has stopped.

D. Publicity may attract more observers.

E. Every photograph is duplicated.

Soal 25. Why is accepting only specialists presented as an incomplete solution?

A. It would increase volunteer numbers automatically.

B. Specialists never follow methods.

C. It guarantees false identification.

D. It would remove all uncertainty.

E. It could reduce geographical coverage.

Soal 26. What is the function of the paragraph about no sightings?

A. To argue that volunteers should stop recording.

B. To explain useful negative records while limiting their interpretation.

C. To replace fieldwork with publicity.

D. To prove birds are absent from every quiet location.

E. To reject observation effort.

Soal 27. Select all recommended measures.

A. Treating every increased count as ecological change.

B. Expert review of unusual reports.

C. Identification guidance.

D. Labels for uncertain observations.

E. Recording visited locations without sightings.

Soal 28. Mark each statement True or False.

Statement	True	False
a. Visibility can affect detection.
b. A place with no submitted report must have been visited.
c. Citizen observations and structured surveys can complement each other.

Soal 29. Select all circumstances that weaken a claim that higher report totals show earlier migration.

A. Dates and effort were measured identically with unchanged coverage.

B. New routes made previously unvisited sites accessible.

C. Observer effort increased substantially near the start of the season.

D. The same standardised survey independently confirms earlier arrivals.

E. The campaign began earlier this year than last year.

Soal 30. Mark each evaluation True or False.

Statement	True	False
a. A record of no sighting is more informative when observation effort is known.
b. The author argues that method transparency can improve public understanding of science.
c. Combining data sources automatically removes every sampling bias.

Share :